Sunday, December 1, 2013

John Lewis and the Two Congresses

            After analyzing the actions of Representative John Lewis for a semester, it is apparent that the two Congresses are not compatible with each other. Instead, the legislative and representative roles that members of Congress must play ultimately make their job extremely difficult and compromise hard to come by. Instead of allowing members to focus on one task, members of Congress have to balance multiple roles, which make each role more difficult. Part of the reason why each role is made more difficult is because they are driven apart because they are not compatible in the current Congress. Members have to report back to their districts and constituencies, which makes legislating harder than it needs to be. While some members of Congress may be willing to compromise on certain issues, their role as representatives hold them back because they ultimately have to answer to their constituencies every two years. Because of this the two Congresses are not compatible because each role has the possibility of contradicting the other for most members of Congress.

            One of the prime examples of the difficulty that Representative Lewis has dealt with in dealing with the two Congresses deals with the Affordable Care Act. Earlier in the semester, Lewis was one of the outspoken advocates of the legislation and took every opportunity he had to suggest that Republicans were trying to kill legislation that had already been declared constitutional by the Supreme Court. During this time, support for the Affordable Care Act was much higher than it is today. Even though the Affordable Care Act was going to hurt one of the hospitals in Representative Lewis’ district, he still supported the bill fervently. This is a prime example of the struggle between the roles as representative and legislator. As a representative, this was negative for Lewis because the hospital was not the only party affected, as Lewis’ constituents who used the hospital would also suffer because the Affordable Care Act would cause the hospital to drop several programs. Even though this legislation would affect many people in his district, Lewis eventually sided with the legislator side, believing that the Affordable Care Act was necessary legislation for the American people. Many times Lewis called the legislation a right and not a privilege and because of this, he supported the bill even though it would hurt his district. (John Lewis Shows Strong Support for the Affordable Care Act)

Lewis’ strict stance regarding the Affordable Care Act was also a reason for the government shutdown in October. Much like Lewis, many other members of Congress were unwilling to budge on their opinions regarding the Affordable Care Act. This ultimately led to an inability for Congress to compromise and the government shutdown to occur. Even after the shutdown, Representative Lewis blamed other members of Congress for their unwillingness to compromise, even though he showed no willingness either. (John Lewis Critical of Leadership in House) Lewis had to promote the image that it was not his fault in order to maintain the support of his constituents. If he pointed any blame at himself, it would make him seem as though he was not doing his job and was not representing the people of his district. Instead, Lewis had to make sure that he appeared to be a strong legislator with influence in Congress in order to show his constituents that he was still working hard. It seems as though many members of Congress involve themselves in this practice so that they do not seem like they are weak or inadequate representatives. This practice has no part in the legislative process, but it affects the process greatly because it makes it more difficult for members of Congress to compromise. Therefore, the representation role creates difficulty for the legislative role, as members of Congress are concerned with maintaining the support of their constituents, which makes them unwilling to budge on certain issues.

            Members of Congress also have very busy schedules due to the two Congresses. Instead of being able to focus primarily on one facet, members have to involve themselves in lawmaking as well as representing. Because of this, their schedules are often packed with events that take them away from their legislative duties. Since Mr. Lewis is one of the most renowned members of the Civil Rights Movement, he is frequently attending events around the United States. One such example occurred early on in the semester when Mr. Lewis traveled to Birmingham, Alabama to attend an event commemorating the lives of four women, who died in an attack on a church during the Civil Rights Movement. (A Week of Reflection for John Lewis) This event came during the same week of the crisis in Syria. Therefore, Mr. Lewis had to leave Washington to attend this ceremony, even though there was a debate occurring about the actions that should be taken in Syria. If Representative Lewis were to skip the event, it would look badly in the eyes of his constituents because of his status as a key member of the Civil Rights Movement. Therefore, he had to leave Washington and the debate regarding legislative measures in order to perform his representative duties, which includes promoting civil liberties.

            After following Representative John Lewis this semester, it is clear that the two Congresses are not compatible. Instead both roles are arduous alone, but when forced to coexist they become very difficult to fulfill. As seen with some of the instances with Lewis, members of Congress ultimately have to pick one of the roles rather than serve both fully. This is detrimental to the process because members of Congress now face the difficult task of appeasing both. This does not seem to be working, as the government shutdown and other failures to agree have shown that Congress is not firing on all cylinders. A big part of this problem is that members of Congress are bogged down with serving both roles, rather than focusing on individual problems. It seems as though this problem will not only continue, but will become worse in the future.

Sources

No comments: