Friday, October 2, 2015

Bill of Attainder

Planned Parenthood has been the major topic in Congress for multiple weeks. However, can the Congressional defunding of Planned Parenthood even be legally accomplished? Many discuss the issues with the controversy over Planned Parenthood, but has anyone discussed the constitutionality of the matter? It seems that if the defunding were to pass, an unconstitutional bill of attainder would be present. The Supreme Court has defined a bill of attainder as a law that legislatively determines guilt and inflicts punishment upon an individual without the protections of a judicial trial. Essentially it is a “trial by legislature rather than a trial by court (Cohen).” Three legal requirements must be met to declare a bill of attainder which consists of a) the legislative act must specify the affected person b) there must be declared guilt and a punishment to follow and c) there is a lack of a judicial trial.
It appears that all three requirements are being met in the instance of Planned Parenthood. The law targets an individual (criteria a), as it solely defunds Planned Parenthood. (This brings up the question of whether or not an organization or corporation can be considered as an individual entity). This removing of federal funding to an organization that provides screening, counseling, information, etc. is a clear punishment (meeting criteria b). Funding is threatened to be removed based on the fabricated Republican idea that Planned Parenthood sells aborted fetal body parts. Even if this were true, it does not make sense to take away money from other parts of the organization that have nothing to do with the alleged crimes. Federal money already cannot go towards abortion; therefore funds would be taken away from other helpful medical services. This is an apparent punishment to an organization that serves to help thousands. And finally, the punishment would most certainly be inflicted without any judicial trial as there has been no court that has found that Planned Parenthood has violated the law. Even if Planned Parenthood were to have violated a federal law, then the proper way to respond according to the Constitution would be to hold a hearing in which the organization could present its case. There was a a show trial for Planned Parenthood, however that only means that, by definition, there was a "judicial trial held in public with the intention of influencing public opinion, rather than ensuring justice."
The Constitution prohibits a bill of attainder because it takes away some of the civil liberties that are at the heart of our democracy. In addition, it violates the separation of powers and the checks and balances that come with it; the judiciary is responsible for trying, convicting, and punishing individuals while the legislature is responsible for broader policy making. The bill of attainder provision was created to prevent Congress from stepping over the Court, and as Congress members continue to fight with one another and with employees of Planned Parenthood it seems more and more that they are trying to be the Court as well as have their congressional duties. The defunding of Planned Parenthood originally started out as a budgetary matter for Congress to handle, but as soon as issues arose regarding the fabricated videos, I believe it turned into a case for the judicial system to immediately handle before any further questioning/ decision making.
It seems to me that recently Congress has been much more interested in the making of legislation rather than paying close attention to the key principles of our country. Which is more important- the end result of the policy making process, or the fact that the policy being made closely follows the ideas of our Founding Fathers? While this post includes a very simplified analysis of the issues with Planned Parenthood, it aims to address the possible Constitutional restrictions that are being sidestepped as politicians and the public alike search for an end to the debate. It is unclear what the ultimate conclusion will be in the Planned Parenthood debate, but Congress needs to be careful when it comes to violating the Constitution.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/senate-planned-parenthood_55b7bd0be4b0224d883412f4
http://www.thefacultylounge.org/2015/09/planned-parenthood-defunding-as-unconstitutional.html
http://www.thenation.com/article/planned-parenthood-show-trial/

No comments: