This morning, after weeks of speculation and rumors, Speaker
John Boehner announced that he would be resigning from Congress on October
30th. Everyone’s favorite crying Congressman said, “The first job of any speaker is to protect this institution that we all love. […] I was my plan to only serve as speaker until the end of last year, but I stayed on to provide continuity to the Republican conference and the House. It is my view, however, that prolonged leadership turmoil would do irreparable damage to the institution.”
Speaker Boehner has had his share
of hardship trying to reconcile with the Republican Party’s Tea Party
extremists, most recently over their attempts to shut down the government over
the funding of Planned Parenthood. Since
the Republicans are still the majority, it will be up to them to choose a new
speaker. Currently, the top contender appears to be Representative Kevin
McCarthy of California.
House Representatives have been
reacting to Boehner’s announcement in various ways. Moderate Republican, and
our own Congressman here in Allentown, Representative Charlie Dent commented,
saying, “It’s clear to me that the rejectionist members of our conference
clearly had an influence on this decision. That’s why I’m not happy about what
happened today.” More conservative members of the GOP, including 2016
Presidential candidate and Tea Party Leader Senator Ted Cruz, and 2016
Presidential candidate Marco Rubio, were not as kind in their remarks, Senator
Rubio claiming that, “The time has come to turn the page and allow a new generation of leadership in this country.”
But what does Speaker Boehner’s
resignation mean for the future of the Republican Party? A party this divided can only keep it together
for so long, and choosing a new Speaker with even stronger conservative views
could be detrimental to the party’s longevity in the House, especially with
such massive elections around the corner. If a new Speaker steps in and allows
the government to shutdown over the funding of Planned Parenthood as Senator
Cruz wants, they will be off to an even shakier start than Speaker Boehner was,
and probably will not hold the American people’s favor for long.
It seems to me that the best thing
the Republican Party could do would be to choose a moderate mediator, someone
who could force the two parties dividing Congress to work together and try to
increase the American people’s ever-sinking approval of Congress. But with strong
Tea Party leadership, and a very partisan body, it appears that this probably
will not happen, and that the new Speaker of the House will be an even stronger
conservative than Speaker Boehner. If this is the case, the House will be more
divided than ever, and will struggle even harder to get work done. And how
would that reflect the Republican Party come elections next fall? If members of
the GOP aren’t careful, the new Speaker of the House could destroy them.
Source:
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/26/us/john-boehner-to-resign-from-congress.html?_r=0
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/politics/ct-john-boehner-resign-20150925-story.html
http://www.nytimes.com/video/us/politics/100000003938119/boehner-announces-his-resignation.html?ribbon-ad-idx=3&rref=homepage&module=Ribbon&version=origin®ion=Header&action=click&contentCollection=Home%20Page&pgtype=article
http://www.nytimes.com/video/us/politics/100000003937974/reaction-to-boehners-resignation.html?playlistId=100000002829479
http://www.nytimes.com/video/us/politics/100000003937974/reaction-to-boehners-resignation.html?playlistId=100000002829479
1 comment:
The job Speaker Boehner leaves will open a gap in Republican leadership that they will have to fill almost immediately. I don't think your analysis is sound when you say that the best thing the Republican Party could do is pick a moderate for the Speaker of the House. I think that it might be best for the functionality of the government, but the party seems unlikely to bring in another moderate. After years of Boehner bending to Democrats to keep Congress up and running, this is an opportunity for Republicans to enact some revenge. I see them bringing in a radical and really going to war with the Democrats and trying to win a few battles over spending.
One drawback to this plan is that it will look bad for Republicans if they control both chambers of Congress and cannot pass legislature because of an unwillingness to compromise. The GOP won't want to sacrifice what good will they have left with the public with a major election coming up. It can shift the tide away from whoever they nominate. In this case, I see how your analysis may be correct, but I don't think that the party will shy away from its younger vocal leaders.
Post a Comment