Thursday, November 14, 2013

Republicans Can't Seem to Agree


The Republican Party is split. Various politicians have different agendas. Congressman Jeff Denham has begun the initiative to support immigration reform that would provide millions of immigrants a path to citizenship, a measure and bill that was passed by 185 Democrats (Dumain). However, Republican Party leaders have ultimately been very reluctant to “hop on board” with Congressman Denham and his endorsement of the Democratic immigration reform (Shabad).
            The Republican Party looking to gain momentum for the 2014 congressional election is proving to be on two different pages. The House Republican majority- whip Kevin McCarthy (Calif.), the third ranking House Republican, has explicitly told immigration advocates the House of Representatives will not vote on immigration reform in this year (Shabad). In complete contradiction to Congressman Denham’s goal, a house vote on immigration reform is not likely to happen within the year.
            As evident by the House Republican Whip’s statement and Congressman Denham’s actions over the course of the past few weeks, there is a disconnect between Republican leadership and individual congress members in the House. An attempt to illustrate to the American people a bi-partisan bill where each side of the isle didn’t matter, Congressman Denham’s proactive role in tackling immigration reform has indeed fallen short (Martinez).
Yes a valiant effort to put political party differences aside, but an effort that was not seen by all, especially to the leaders in his party. With the 2014 Congressional elections around the corner, one must wonder if this disconnect in the Republican Party as a whole will adversely affect the number of seats the Republicans gain or lose. As Congressman Denham noted, “I did something that would be suicidal… in a general election cycle… joined forced with pro-immigration reform groups.. some who have hit Republicans hard in every election year.” (Martinez) It remains to be seen what the outcome will be.

Sources





No comments: